FEAExplicit DynamicsHail ImpactRadomeComposite SandwichSyntactic Foam CoreProgressive DamageParticle HydrodynamicsAerospace

Explicit Dynamics Hail Impact Simulation of an Aircraft Radome

Explicit dynamics simulation of repeated hail strikes on a composite sandwich radome, mapping how damage starts and grows from one impact to the next.

All Case Studies
Explicit Dynamics Hail Impact Simulation of an Aircraft Radome — featured
Context

Project brief

An aircraft radome has to shield the radar inside it and stay transparent to radar signals at the same time, so its wall is thin and light. Hail is one of the harshest loads it meets in flight.

The client wanted to know how its composite sandwich radome would cope with repeated hail strikes at flight speed, and at what point damage would start. Shirsh Technosolutions simulated the impact sequence using explicit dynamics in ANSYS.

The problem

What was at risk

The radome wall is a sandwich of fibre-reinforced composite skins on both sides of a porous syntactic foam core. It is thin enough for radar, but each impact can crush the core or crack the skins, and the next strike lands on a panel that is already weakened.

The client specified a spherical hailstone striking normal to the surface at flight speed, repeated on the same spot. At that speed ice does not behave like a solid ball. It shatters and spreads on contact, and that changes the load the panel feels.

Our answer

Solution offered

We used explicit dynamics, which takes very small time steps and is suited to short, violent events with contact, large deformation and material failure. The hailstone was modelled with particle hydrodynamics so that it breaks up and spreads on impact the way real ice does.

The skins were given orthotropic properties with progressive failure, so damage along the fibres and across them is tracked separately. The core was given a crushable foam model with a compressive stress-strain curve, so it can collapse locally and absorb energy. The layers were assumed perfectly bonded, and the panel was held at its real mounting points so it could flex locally.

Each strike was solved as its own transient event in sequence. After every impact we checked ply stresses along and across the fibres against the failure criteria, building a picture of how the damage grew from one hit to the next.

Common questions

Why model hail as particles instead of a solid sphere? At flight speed, ice shatters and spreads almost like a fluid. A solid sphere stays in one piece and puts an unrealistically concentrated load on the skin. A particle model lets the hailstone break up and spread the load the way real hail does.

Why use explicit dynamics for an impact? An impact is over in a very short time, with stress waves travelling through the layers. Explicit solvers march through it in very small time steps and cope well with contact and failing material, where an implicit solution would struggle.

The hurdles

Challenges we overcame

Thin sandwich wall of composite skins on a porous foam core

Hail that shatters and spreads on impact instead of staying solid

Repeated strikes on the same, increasingly damaged spot

Holding the radome at its mounts so the panel could flex locally

Judging damage ply by ply, along and across the fibres

Methodology

How we executed

  1. 1

    Built the layered sandwich model of the radome panel with outer skin, core and inner skin

  2. 2

    Modelled the hailstone with particle hydrodynamics so it fragments on impact

  3. 3

    Gave the skins orthotropic progressive failure and the core a crushable foam model

  4. 4

    Fixed the panel at its real mounting points

  5. 5

    Solved each strike in sequence as its own transient event

  6. 6

    Checked ply stresses against the failure criteria after every impact

Results

Project outcome

The first strikes left stresses well below the material allowables, with no damage.

As strikes accumulated, the build-up of strain opened a local puncture in the outer skin only.

Over the later strikes the core lost its ability to absorb energy, ending in local tearing of the inner skin.

The point where safe behaviour turns into local damage gives the client a basis for inspection after hail exposure.

Visuals

Project gallery

Context

Where this lives

At a glance

Aerospace
Industry
ANSYS Mechanical
Lead tool
4
Outcomes
6
Steps
Have a similar project?

We apply the same rigour to every engagement

Let us show you what's possible for your product.